NotForYouTube: H.P. Offers Private Video Sharing

Gabble screen shot.

Google, meet Gabble.

Gabble is a new site from Hewlett-Packard that lets people post videos online. But unlike Google’s YouTube service, which is geared to sharing with the masses, only people invited to your Gabble group can view your videos.

H.P. thinks that its orientation toward privacy will appeal to families uncomfortable making their home videos public and to businesses that want to use videos as a collaboration tool.

Of course, you can tweak the privacy settings on YouTube or Facebook to do much the same thing. But H.P. says that defaulting to private videos makes life easier on the average person. Make of that argument what you will.

Gabble came out of H.P. Labs, where the project was previously known as Conversa. The online service remains in beta, and has only recently been opened up to the public at large.

Gabble is part of H.P.’s strategy of trying out a variety of online, cloudlike services as it hunts for a hit. “If they go viral and take off quickly, then we will support them,” said Shane Robison, H.P.’s chief technology officer, during a recent interview. “If they don’t, we’ll take them down pretty quickly.”

For example, H.P. fired up an online storage service called Upline in April 2008 and closed it down in February. Meanwhile, it’s still working on a vanity magazine publishing service called MagCloud.

Most of these services feed at least a pair of H.P.’s businesses. The video service, for example, could drive sales of networking and storage gear, while MagCloud primes H.P.’s printing and storage businesses.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

H-P is late to the party, sad to say. A number of companies, including 3Sharp, offer enterprise video tools to allow companies to securely share video content. I can’t imagine that many companies will be interested in a service that a) they don’t control themselves and b) might go away at any minute. (if you’re interested in more information on our solution, check out //www.3sharp.com/podcasting).

“If they go viral and take off quickly, then we will support them,” said Shane Robison, H.P.’s chief technology officer, during a recent interview. “If they don’t, we’ll take them down pretty quickly.”

Such a sentiment makes it easy for me to keep my videos right where they are.

“If they go viral and take off quickly, then we will support them,” said Shane Robison, H.P.’s chief technology officer, during a recent interview. “If they don’t, we’ll take them down pretty quickly.”

Wow. They never would have made it out of the garage with this philosophy.

Start the dismantling, HP. That’s about as “pretty quickly” as is gets.

First thing that comes to mind is “core-competency?” The second thing that comes to mind is that the strategy of trying things out to see if they work, is more useful to a company like Google that can funnel millions of existing users through the experiment (Google Labs) without having to go out and acquire them as HP will have to do.

Late to the Party? How does that matter. Facebook was late to the party and became dominant. It’s always possible to upset.

From my understanding, Youtube already has privacy settings from my understanding, where you can select an option that only friends can view your video.

In fact the folks who are late to the party are usually the winners… Google was late to the party, and look where they are now. (Think back to yahoo, Lycos, altavista, hotbot, etc…)

I can’t believe HP’s cluelessness. Basically they’re telling potential users that they are releasing a service that they might whip away at any point. Why risk sing it in the first place? Duh.

Steve in Portland, OR April 15, 2009 · 4:14 pm

HP does have a lot of catching up to do. Facebook allows you to upload pictures and video and post notes and control which individuals or groups (ie. family, business) can view/access that content. FB is also growing in leaps and bounds.

Will video messaging catch on? I find a slightly fictionalized presence on the Web, or one I can control such as through chat or Facebook, is more desireable. But I wonder if this is my generation’s hang-up and if the kids really care about their presence in the same way.

Two things
1. The comment about bringing it down soon if not popular is not very encouraging to me as a user.
2. Since HP is not like Yahoo or Google, who have a lot of users already, it would be more prudent to make up their mind about this site. At this point, it does not seem clear as to whether HP wants to offer this service in return for mass adoption (thereby earning ad revenue from it) or is it focusing on a small group of heavy users who pay a subscription. The models are completely different based on the vision, which is sorely missing.

“…H.P. fired up an online storage service called Upline in April 2008 and closed it down in February”

Yes, this is bound to be a success.

What incredible non-news. Youtube (as well as many other video sharing sites) allow you to make a video private and can only be accessed by friends and others who are invited. Plus, it’s really easy to do, Youtube asks you if you want to make the video private or public when you upload it.

Oh, and one more thing, isn’t it hard to see fault with a business model that will rely on a very very small amount of views per mb’s of data uploaded? How could this possibly ever work?

Multiply.com has been doing this for several years. Best kept “not so secret” JEWEL on the internet for sharing not only videos, but hi resolution photos, blogs, .. and STILL – only with those you wish to share with – Privately or publicly.

//multiply.com/info/corp

i have to agree with linda. multiply has not only been doing this for years, but multiply also has unlimited photo sharing, blogging (so you can write about the cool things your kids said and did and not just show pics and video of it), recipe sharing, opinon sharing (reviews), and the ability to join up into affinity groups as well. and if you become a member, for only $20/yr, you also get unlimited video and photo storage.

and the privacy settings are clear (to both poster and viewer) and can be set differently per post. so you can share your great scenery shots with the world while only sharing the pics of the kids with your friends and family.

when multiply has so many great services already well integrated, why would anyone jump on hp’s bandwagon?

I think HP is just being upfront about the fact that this is only an experiment.

Look at Google Pages and Yahoo! Geocities. They allowed users to copy back their stuff when they closed shops.

Maybe an assurance and commitment from HP that it will encourage standardization and data portability will help.

Oh, and could someone please check the IP address for barefootmeg? :P