Obama to Select Genachowski to Lead F.C.C.

President-elect Barack Obama intends to nominate Julius Genachowski , an adviser on technology issues and longtime friend, to become the next chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, advisers to Mr. Obama said.

Mr. Genachowski, 46, was a major fund-raiser for the Obama campaign who also played a leading role in the campaign’s highly successful online strategy. He remains very close to Mr. Obama—both men went to Columbia College and Harvard Law School and the two served together on the Harvard Law Review. They also were basketball buddies.

During the campaign, Mr. Genachowski shaped many of Mr. Obama’s telecom policies. He advocated an open Internet in the debate over so-called “net neutrality,’’ and media-ownership rules that promote a diversity of voices on the airwaves.

People involved in the transition said that Mr. Genachowski was a top candidate for both the chairmanship and a new White House position overseeing technology issues that has not been fully defined yet.

If confirmed, one of his first challenges at the commission will be what to do about the problems plaguing the conversion to digital television. The Obama transition team has asked Congress to delay the conversion, set for Feb. 17, because millions of viewers have been unable to obtain coupons to pay for converter boxes that would enable their sets to receive signals once all broadcasters lose their analog signal. (The conversion will not affect viewers who subscribe to cable or satellite television services.)

The chairmanship of the F.C.C. has played a more expansive role in regulating the economy, particularly with the rise of the Internet and wireless communications over the last 20 years. Now, as the new administration plans to make the expansion of broadband and Internet services a significant part of its stimulus package, Mr. Genachowski, with his close ties to Mr. Obama, could wind up with an even bigger role than his predecessors in shaping economic policy.

After graduating from law school, Mr. Genachowski clerked for federal appeals court judge Abner J. Mikva after Mr. Obama turned down the same job. Mr. Genachowski then clerked for Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter. He was chief counsel to Reed Hundt, a chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, during the Clinton administration. He then worked for eight years as a senior executive at Barry Diller’s IAC/Interactive Corporation. He also founded an investment and advisory firm for digital media companies and co-founded the country’s first commercial “green’’ bank.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Mr. Genachowski sounds well-qualified for the FCC charimanship. One challenge he will face is to ensure diversity in the “new media” so that is does not come to be dominated by a few mega-firms as is the case with the MSM.

former american citizen in Sweden January 13, 2009 · 9:25 am

Where are the Arabs and Muslims….Barack?

Is it a Dirty Word ……being this way ? Jewish is totally ok in my book, but it looks like you are being really ….perhaps

Prejudice…??

Another cable indusry pioneer will protect the industry business model of bundling countless channels subscribers don’t watch.

Net neutrality and an open internet are crucial to our, and the world’s freedom. Next, an end to the consolidation of the media in all its forms. Nice appointment.

I am so tired of politicians getting jobs for their buddies. This is why nobody should ever assume the government is really wise enough to manage aspects of our lives.

Does being an Obama buddy, a baller, and throwback to the Clinton days the only qualifications needed to lead the FCC? So much for new vision and fresh talent. From his resume Mr. Genachowski may be adept at navigating statutory straits and political seas but what about reconciling regulations with the needs of telecoms and cablers facing a reduction in demand for access lines and other services especially where demand destruction is being blown about by a declining economy?

Alton E. Drew
//www.altondrew.com

here ya go….

Make Ganachowski an advisor on technology issues?
Where is his degree in engineering? He is merely a laywer. You will see that his advice will look good at a surface inspection but does not embody the complexity of the particular Technological issue at hand. In other words his advice for the long term technological issues will not be good.

Hey people – considering where we have come from these past few years (thanks for nothing lil’Kev) the FCC has no place to go but up! Lil’Kev, that’s your u-haul sitting out at the curb – get busy- move along!

Building a good, smart government is Obama’s goal. Can’t do that with inexperience or with idiots. The FCC is required to protect the consumer and foster competition. I suspect that is Obama’s charge to Mr. Genachowski and I see nothing in his background or education that says “mistake”. Give the man a chance.

Because of a combination of vocational and personal issues, I have followed the Commission for over forty years. Like it or not, the days of commissioners with engineering backgrounds are over. That said, this guy could not help being a great improvement over Li’l Kev – the current commission is by far the most politicized in the history of the agency.

Genchowski is a smart man, not a crook or a toady like Kev, with no apparent axes to grind. He should be a good appointment.

Satellite radio is another business that got stuck with a monopolistic business model. There are many broadcast radio stations that would provide more interesting programming that Sirius-XM if they had access to national broadcasting over satellite channels.

While I hear Columbia College is a fine institution it is my understanding that President Elect Obama attended Columbia University.

Remember when Bush picked Colin Powell’s son—and then Judas gave him the payback. At least Michael Powell had the good sense to support John McCain.

To Alton E. Drew:

“Does being an Obama buddy, a baller, and throwback to the Clinton days the only qualifications needed to lead the FCC?”

No, but those aren’t his only qualifications. I would say Columbia College, Harvard Law School, Harvard Law Review, clerkships at the federal appellate level and the Supreme Court, prior work as counsel at the FCC, and an executive job in the private sector are pretty good as a resume. If anything, they make it seem as if he may be overqualified for the job.

But I support the choice not because of the resume but because maintaining net neutrality is critical to maintaining the culture of online citizen journalism and participation that is reinvigorating our political life.

This time, Obama did good.

This certainly looks like another fine appointment by the president-elect – and to anyone who shouts “croneyism” I would suggest that they consider the benefits of having a crucially important post filled by someone who will always be able to get access to the man at the desk where the buck stops.

The history of broadcasting in this country is a sad, sad, story, landing us, as it has, with a virtual monopoly in the hands of corporate giants determined to maximize profits. Which makes the Internet the only hope we have of being able to get the truth “out there” where it belongs.

Congratulations, Mr Genachowski, and Every Good Wish for your success.

Well,

If you needed further proof that we are a country ruled by Israel and it’s Zionist occupants, here you go. Take a look at 99% of his cabinet and it’s plain as day.

But, what can we expect. They “elected” him.

To poster #12: Columbia College is one of the 15 or so constituent entities that make up Columbia University – there are two other undergraduate entities, Barnard College (whose graduations are included in the Columbia University Commencements) and the School of General Studies, which is where mature and/or part-time students go to get a B.A. In addition that are many graduate schools, both liberal – in the PhD-producing Graduate School of Arts and Sciences – and professional, Law, Business, Social Work, Architecture, and the Arts, et al., and the four schools that occupy the medical campus uptown.

Columbia is a notoriously fragmented and every-man-for-himself institution, but at Commencement it is, for one day in the year, a genuine UNIversity.

I expect this will prove to be another excellent appointment. It will be great to have the FCC back into the hands of adults with broadcast community in mind. I hope we can say the same by the SC during the next 8 years.

To comment #13. Columbia College in the City of New York is the undergraduate school of Columbia University. Barack got his A.B. from the College.

Background. There are five FCC commissioners, who serve 5 year terms. Genachowski will replace Republican Deborah Tate. Continuing are Democrats Copps and Adelstein and Republicans Martin (chairman presently) and McDowell.

Michael Powell was (in)famously chairman 2001-2005.

Net neutrality is all well and good-not to mention vital-for c2c, c2b, and b2b goods and services, and I hope Mr. Genachowski is up to the job on that count. But more to the point of protecting our democracy, the FCC chair is and will be critical to the question of *real* campaign finance reform. CFR is almost always talked about in terms of fundraising and spending limitations of candidates, but RARELY in relation to the balance-sheets of the media companies all political campaign fundraising is actually for.

Why do we allow private, for-profit media companies to charge top advertising dollars for those seeking to enter public service on all levels? It distorts our entire political system, and by extension, the functioning of our government on behalf of the electorate in general, rather than the biggest donors in particular.

This issue is directly under the purview of the FCC in regulating the interface between private profit-making and the notion of a ‘public space’ provision of our airwaves as is theoretically exercised through the broadcast licensing renewals of broadcasting entities.

If this administration and nominated FCC chair are truly serious about fixing our political system for the future of our country, it MUST address the root causes of the current money requirements of our political system. As a suggestion, I would encourage those responsible to look at the CSPAN model of provisioning a public service from our private media companies. To conform with our Constitution, such outlets would be funded by media (as CSPAN currently is) but administered by existing state agencies for county, state, and federal representative races. Production costs would be borne by the campaigns, but airtime costs would be nominal if even necessary.

The question of any private media lock-out requirements are important but not incompatible with the general notion of taking the current profit-making, fund-raising driven, and policy-corrupting system of campaigning off the table.

The media companies will hate it, and call it ‘hugely controversial’. But ultimately every citizen-including those running private media companies-will win with a more responsive, coherent, and representative government we can all be proud of.

Wow. Apparently not one commenter cares that this nominee’s views tend to be anti-freedom at a time when we need to allow as much room for creativity, wealth creation and innovation as possible.

Both of this guy’s big ideas are bad. Net neutrality is a bad idea because broadband QoS will allow new services to run without having to worry about being bogged down by Torrents, Limewire and the like. “Media ownership rules that promote a diversity of voices on the airwaves,” sounds a heck of a lot like the Fairness Doctrine to me. Why on earth would you want to impose a regulation like that on an industry that has seen superlative growth and creativity without ever coming close to needing government money?

This looks like Mr. Obama’s worst nominee thus far.

Observe how the FCC is allocated between the two established government-chartered political parties in the US.

Third parties are blocked at the media door in the US. The airwaves are filled right-wing sociopathy and Bible stations across much of the country.

You can’t transfer into Columbia College. Obama received his degree from the School of General Studies at Columbia University.

Mr. Miller, your doublespeak is hilarious. Net Neutrality prevents network owners from showing preferential treatment for some web portals over another, much like the phone company and transportation companies have “common carrier” regulations that prevent favoritism, or censorship in this case. Whether for profit or not, that’s bad for the Internet.

Your crack about the Fairness Doctrine has what? to do with this? Are you anti-fairness? Without the Fairness Doctrine, the public discourse has deteriorated drastically, with people never being exposed to views in opposition to the dominant media-owner’s.

Fairness used to be a core American value.