Home On TV & Video Studio71: How Video Multichannel Networks Fight To Break Through The Noise

Studio71: How Video Multichannel Networks Fight To Break Through The Noise

SHARE:

A few years ago, video multichannel networks (MCNs) had the luxury of choice: get access to a large, scaled audience via YouTube or go with a handful of new video upstarts wooing content creators with pricier payouts.

But the digital video landscape has dramatically shifted since, as digital publishers and broadcast nets alike increasingly distribute their own short-form video content through YouTube, Facebook, Snap and other platforms.

“The stakes are a lot higher now than what you originally saw on YouTube where everyone was literally just throwing shit at the wall,” said Reza Izad, the co-founder and CEO of Studio71, the MCN subsidiary of German broadcaster ProSieben. “Now, the projects are larger, and with YouTube Red and Facebook Watch emerging, quality matters more than ever.”

Even so, the opportunity for content creators has never been greater.

Studio71 has evolved into one of the most scaled global MCNs after gaining a number of international broadcast investments.

In addition to ProSieben’s 70% stake in Studio71, the French and Italian broadcasters TF1 and Mediaset also invested $56 million in the company in January to fund Studio71’s European video expansion.

Izad spoke with AdExchanger about what’s next for Studio71’s content and advertising businesses.

AdExchanger: What’s one of your biggest challenges?

REZA IZAD: Anyone can grow their production efforts, but if you don’t deliver a hit, you won’t be in business in eight months.

The reality is, the market that was once the domain of the digital native only is now competing with TV people who see less opportunity in traditional broadcast and who are looking at this space and saying, “Hey, I can do that, too.” We’ve always been striving to do excellent work, but we’ve got to deliver hits into these OTT platforms.

How is Studio71’s business going?

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

We have a really unique advertising product. We take top-tier local TV short-form and marry it with a premium list of native digital producers and layer in English-language international talent. This has given us a hyperpremium advertising product that’s done well in Germany, and we expect it to do well in France and Italy.

We raised some capital to start local MCNs in partnership with TF1 and Mediaset, and it’s moving along. We’re in year one, so we’re really just operationalizing these businesses. In France, we’re very far along. We have a 400-million-view-per-month network comprised of significant television content from their portfolio.

Where do you see the most upside in advertising?

We have a lot of scale with a very finite amount of creators, so we’re having a lot of high-value ad placement adjacency conversations with brands, and we sell a good deal in media both in the US and globally in Germany and Canada.

The second part is the branded content piece and … then the performance marketing. And everyone always asks, “What’s the ROI?”

When brands have key metrics they’re looking for like clicks, subscriptions and downloads, we’re able to show a ton of conversion there. You still get the “What’s my view count?” requests when it’s a brand talking about lift or other brand effects, but there’s definitely a lot to apply to mainstream brands from the performance marketer’s world.

Given that you have “studio,” in your name, how much content do you create, and when do you rely on the client’s creative agency?

Companies hire us to help them do hundreds of pieces of content over the course of a year tied to an individual brand. We have a full creative staff with traditional scripted and nonscripted development, a fairly large production staff and tons of assets – something like 15 edit bays and a 20,000-square-foot studio.

From the sales point of view, we’re not trying to usurp an agency on branded content, but the lines definitely bleed together. There’s still a lot of complexity.

When you want to sell media, you talk to two people – the head of media and brand – which is usually after you’ve been recommended by their agency. With branded content, budgets are held by the media agency, and they view the deal in terms of metrics like cost per view.

Creative is important, too, but then you’ve also got the PR shops looking for amplification moments, and they’re the key buyers during the Super Bowl, Fashion Week and big product launches. And then you have the creative shops that treat you more as the production outfit. That’s the schizophrenia of the market.

Switching gears a little, your network investors (ProSieben, TF1 and Mediaset) recently formed a European Broadcaster Exchange to scale pan-European programmatic video. How does that speak to the strength of digital platforms?

When you look at the global scale of what Facebook and YouTube offer, and then you compare it to local video markets where you have these really powerful publishers with massive reach, but that reach is specific to Germany or France, they’re finding a need to come together.

There is a lot of competition they’re facing from these large, global digital platforms, so finding opportunities for pan-European advertising and potentially pan-European rights makes them stronger than being independent in local markets.

In Germany, about 35% of every video dollar, maybe 40%, is spent on the ProSieben platform, but as Google and Facebook ascend, [broadcasters] will need to change their offering to provide advertisers a broader array of services that are not just tied to specific countries.

And the way to do that is to create these combinations of the top broadcasters in all these local markets and share data and tool sets on the back end. Each country doesn’t need to develop all those assets from scratch, and that’s another benefit of a media alliance like this. It’s a co-op effect.

Interview condensed for clarity and length.

Must Read

Pictograph of graph, mug of beer

Inside AB InBev’s Strategy For Tapping Into First-Party Data

Pour one out for third-party data. These days, AB InBev’s digital marketing strategy is built squarely on first-party data.

4A’s Measurement Committee Says New Currencies Aren’t Ready For Prime Time – Yet

The 4A’s measurement committee, a working group for marketers and media buyers to discuss their opinions and concerns about video ad measurement, has some thoughts on the status of alternative TV currencies.

How Chinese Sellers Are Quietly Reshaping US Consumer Habits

American consumers are buying more and more online products directly from Chinese manufacturers. It’s an important change, though many online shoppers are unaware.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

T-Commerce Vs. Shoppable TV

Television commerce, or T-commerce, is similar to shoppable TV: both refer to buying something you see on television. But shoppable TV is far more nascent – and also has different implications on attribution.

Why White Claw’s Parent Company Is Pouring Investment Into Headless Commerce

A booze brand and a “headless commerce” platform walk into a meeting with the CFO. That might sound like the setup for a punchline, but it’s just how mar tech works these days.

As MMM Rides Again, Google Finds Its Place In The Conversation With Meridian

Tracking is a mess. Attribution is broken beyond repair. IP address identity data may go the way of the dodo. Which means marketing mix modeling is back, baby!